*

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI

+

C.M.(M) No.188/2008

%

Date of decision: 08.02.2008

Hari Ram Sharma

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Sumit Kumar Khatri,

Advocate

versus

Naraini Devi Sharma

..... Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest?

VIPIN SANGHI, J

*

CM No.1876/2008

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

CM(M) No.188/2008 & CM No.1875/2008

1.

This petition has been filed to impugn the order passed by

the learned Additional Rent Controller (ARC), Delhi in E. 462, 463, 464

and 465/07/05 dated 06.10.2007, whereby the learned ARC has

rejected the leave to defend applications filed by the respective

tenants in the four petitions filed under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi

Rent Control Act filed by the respondent. The petitioner before me

was the respondent/tenant in E. 463/07/05.

2.

Admittedly, the property in question was purchased by

C.M.(M) No.188/2008

Page 1 of 7

2008:DHC:441

the respondent/landlady on 23