SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
M/S. ACTION CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT – Appellant
Versus
M/S. GULATI INDUSTRIAL FABRIC P. LTD. – Respondent


Page 1 of 12

*

HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI

+

IA No.10073/2006 in CS (OS) No.1740/2006

%

Judgment reserved on : 10th February, 2009

Judgment pronounced on : 13th April, 2009

M/s. Action Construction Equipment

….Plaintiff

Through : Mr. Sanjeev Narula, Adv.

Versus

M/s. Gulati Industrial Fabric P. Ltd.

..... Defendant

Through : Mr. Manish Dhir, Adv.

Coram:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes

in the Digest?

MANMOHAN SINGH, J.

1.

The plaintiff has filed the instant suit for permanent

injunction and misuse of confidential information.

2.

Alongwith the suit, the Plaintiff has also filed an

application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section

151 CPC.

3.

An ex parte ad-interim order was passed against the

defendant on 11.09.2006 in IA No. 10073/2006.

4.

The case of the plaintiff company has been in

existence for more than a decade. It started manufacturing

Mobile Tower Cranes and other infrastructure constr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top