SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AVDESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Crl.A.Nos.513/01, 300/02 & 301/02 Page 1 of 15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI

%

Date of Decision : 14.05.2009

+

CRL.A. 513/2001

AVDESH

…Appellant

Through: Mr.Sumeet Verma, Advocate.

versus

STATE

…Respondent

Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate

CRL.A. 300/2002

VIDHYA LAL

…Appellant

Through: Ms.Padma Priya, Advocate.

versus

STATE

…Respondent

Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate

CRL.A. 301/2002

SANTOSH PANDEY

…Appellant

Through: Mr.V.K.Raina, Advocate.

versus

STATE

…Respondent

Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR KOCHHAR

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed

to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

2009:DHC:2093-DB

Crl.A.Nos.513/01, 300/02 & 301/02 Page 2 of 15

: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (ORAL)

1.

We notice that the counsel nominated by the Legal

Services Authority for appellant Vidhya Lal has not been

appearing in the instant matter which

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top