SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUSHIL SURI – Appellant
Versus
CBI & ANR. – Respondent


Crl.M.C. 3842/2008

Page 1 of 18

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

Crl.M.C. 3842/2008

%

Date of reserve: 12.05.2009

Date of decision: 21.05.2009

MR. SUSHIL SURI

PETITIONER

Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Vishal

Garg, advs.

C.B.I. AND ANR.

...RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr. Harish Gulati, Mr. Anindya

Malhotra, advs.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers Yes

may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to Reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be

Yes

reported in the Digest?

MOOL CHAND GARG, J.

1. This order shall dispose of a petition filed by the petitioner under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR bearing no. R.C.5(E)

2002/SIU/VIII, P.S./CBI/SPE/SIU-VIII registered by Central Bureau of

Investigation (CBI) and the proceedings arising therefrom against the

petitioner on 23.07.2002 under Sections 120B/420/409/468/471 IPC. It

is the case of the petitioner that the present dispute is between the

petitioner and the second respondent regarding paying the dues of the

second respondent which has been settled in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top