SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Power Grid Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
SIEMENS – Respondent


OMP No.429/2004 Page 1 of 6

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Reserve: April 30, 2009

Date of Order: July 14, 2009

+ OMP No.429/2004

%

14.07.2009

POWER GRID CORPN. OF INDIA .... Petitioner

Through : Mr. S.B. Upadhyay, Sr. Adv. with

Ms. Anisha Upadhyay & Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Advs.

Versus

SIEMENS

.... Respondent

Through: Mr. C. Mukund with Mr. Avneesh Garg, Advs.

JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

JUDGMENT

1.

By this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, petitioner has assailed an award dated 15th August,

2004 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal.

2.

Brief facts relevant for deciding this petition are that the

petitioner accepted tender/bid of the respondent for purpose of laying

down transmission lines. Three contracts were entered into between

the parties on 14th March, 2000 for the purpose; one was called as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top