SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PARMIT @ PEHLWAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Bail Application No.1480&1534/2008

Page 1 of 7

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

Bail Application No.1480/2008

%

Reserved on : 23.1.2009

Date of decision: 29.1.2009

PARMIT @ PEHLWAN

…PETITIONER

STATE

...RESPONDENT

WITH

+

Bail Application No.1534/2008

SANDEEP @ KALE

…PETITIONER

STATE

...RESPONDENT

Advocates who appeared for the parties

For Petitioners/applicants: Mr. L.S. Saini, Advocate

For State

: Mr.Arvind Kumar Gupta, APP

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG

1.Whether the Reporters of local papers

may be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.To be referred to Reporter or not?

Yes

3.Whether the judgment should be

Yes

reported in the Digest?

MOOL CHAND GARG, J.

1. This common order shall dispose of the aforesaid two bail

applications filed on behalf of Parmit @ Pehlwan S/o Jagbir Singh

and Sandeep @ Kale S/o Ramesh Kumar, who are undergoing

2009:DHC:302

Bail Application Nos.1480& 1534/2008

Page 2 of 7

trial in a case arising out of FIR No. 133/2007 under Sections

307/302/34 IPC read with Section 25/27 of the Arms Act

registered at Police Statio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top