SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
BHAGIRATH CHOUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
BORDER SECURITY FORCE – Respondent


WP(C) 5989/2008

Page 1 of 6

i.5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

W.P.(C) 5989/2008

BHAGIRATH CHOUDHARY

..... Petitioner

Through : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate

versus

BORDER SECURITY FORCE

THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL ..... Respondent

Through : Mr. Yadunath Singh,

Dy. Commandant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to

see the judgment?

2.To be referred to Reporter or not?

No.

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? No.

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral)

1. Rule DB.

2. Rejoinder affidavit stated to have been filed by the

petitioner yesterday is not on record, but copy thereof has been

handed over by learned counsel in the court. The same has

been considered.

3. Heard for disposal.

2009:DHC:4520-DB

WP(C) 5989/2008

Page 2 of 6

4. The petitioner was employed as a Constable under BSF on

22.02.1971 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top