SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Mr. B.M. Patel – Appellant
Versus
CITI Bank, NA New Delhi – Respondent


Crl.M.C.1906/2009

Page 1 of 7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

Crl.M.C.1906/2009 and Crl.M.A.7121/2009

Reserved on: 24th November, 2009

%

Date of Decision: 25th November, 2009

#

Mr. B.M. Patel

..... Petitioner

!

Through: Mr. D’Souza Philip, Adv.

Versus

$

CITI Bank, NA New Delhi

..... Respondent

^

Through:

Mr.

Akshay

Bipin,

Addl.P.P. for the State.

: V.K. JAIN, J.

1.

This is a petition under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure for quashing complaint cases No. 724/1 of

2008 and 1313/1 of 2008 filed by the respondent under Section

138 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 420 of

Indian Penal Code.

2.

A perusal of the first complaint filed by the

respondent would show that the petitioner who was holding a

Citi Bank card, issued a cheque No.712655 dated 8th February,

2008 for Rs.6,332/- drawn on IDBI Bank towards part payment

of the purchases made by him on the credit card. The cheque,

when presented for encashment, was returned with remarks

“payment stopped insufficient funds”. A legal notice was sent to

the petitioner from Delhi requiring him to pay the amount of the

2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top