CRP.NO.172/2008 & FAO423/2008 Page 1 of 10

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRP.No.172/2008

%

Date of decision: 15^th December, 2009.

VIJAY MANCHANDA & ANR

….… Petitioners

Through: Mr. Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate

Versus

ASHOK MANCHANDA

....... Respondent

Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Advocate.

AND

FAO 423/2008

ASHOK MANCHANDA

….… Petitioner

Through: Mr. Anupam Srivastava, Advocate

Versus

VIJAY MANCHANDA & ORS

....... Respondents

Through: Mr Prabhjit Jauhar, Advocate

CORAM :-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest?

Yes

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The revision petition under section 115 of the CPC and the FAO under Order

43 rule 1(r) of the CPC arise from the orders in the same suit, disposing of the

applications under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Order 39 Rule 4 and Order 7 Rule 11 of

the CPC.

2009:DHC:5458

CRP.NO.172/2008 & FAO423