* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 17.12.2009

+

WP (C) No.16258 of 2006

SAMBHAVANA

…PETITIONER

Ms. Ritu Kumar, Advocate.

DELHI UNIVERSITY & ORS.

…RESPONDENTS

Ms. Maninder Acharya, Advocate

for Delhi University.

Mr. Amitesh Kumar, Adv. for R-2.

Ms. Beenashaw Soni, Advocate

for R-3, 22 & 56.

Dr. Aurobindo Ghose, Advocate

for R-4, 12 & 79.

Mr. Pawan Kumar Agarwal, Adv.

for R-8, 24, 26, 27, 30, 34, 40, 52,

57, 58 & 83.

Ms. Manisha Singh, Adv. for R-13.

Ms. Parul Sharma, Advocate

for R-14 & 50.

Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Adv. for R-

19, 25, 43, 44, 61, 63, 64, 75 & 76.

Mr. M.K. Singh, Adv. for R-23&81.

Mr. N. Chaudhary & Ms. Sushma,

Advocates for R-28 & 82.

Mr. Rajesh & Mr. Rohit Singh,

Advocates for R-29.

Mr. R.P. Sharma, Adv. for R-31.

Mr. Rajinder Dhawan & Ms. Shafali

Dhawan, Advs. for R-33, 38, 65, 66,

73 & 77.

Mr. Navin Chawla & Mr. Sharath

Sampath, Advs. for R-39.

Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. for R-41.

Mr. Prashant M., Advocate for R-53.

Mr. Mamta Chandra, Adv. for R-55.

Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Advocate

for R-59 & 60.

Mr. Anurag Mathur, Advocate

for R-15, 83 & 84.

Mr. Samar Bansal, Adv. for R-85