SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PIONEER PUBLICITY CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT MARKETING – Respondent


*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CS(OS) No. 447/2005 & IA No.12227/2006

%

Date of Decision: January 13, 2009

# Pioneer Publicity Corp.

..... Plaintiff

!

Through: Mr. Hari Kishan, Advocate

Versus

$ Bharat Marketing

.....Defendant

^

Through: Mr. Murari Kumar, Advocate

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

1.

Whether reporters of Local paper may be allowed to see

the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the

Digest?

S.N.AGGARWAL, J (ORAL)

The plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendant for

recovery of Rs.55,59,132/- under Order XXXVII CPC.

2

In response to summons of the suit, the defendant has filed its

leave to defend application seeking unconditional leave to defend

the present suit.

3

Arguments on the leave to defend application have been

CS(OS)No.447/2005

Page 1 of 6

2009:DHC:63

heard.

4

The basis of the plaintiff's claim against the defendant in the

present suit is admission of liability by the defendant in its books of

account for the period from 01.04.2003 to 29.01.2004 sent to the

plaintiff. The ledger account of the pla

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top