SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SAT PRAKASH RANA – Appellant
Versus
THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent


WP(C) No.1637/2010

Page 1 of 20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P.(C) No. 1637 of 2010 & CMs 3294-95/2010

SAT PRAKASH RANA

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Jayant Tripathi and

Ms. Ruchi Saini, Advocates.

versus

THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI AND ANR.

..... Respondents

Through: Mr. N. Waziri, Standing counsel for

GNCTD.

CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

1.Whether reporters of local paper may be allowed

to see the judgment?

Yes

2.To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be referred in the digest? Yes

O R D E R

10.03.2010

1.The Petitioner, a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) of

Delhi, seeks the quashing of the proceedings before the Lokayukta,

Delhi in Complaint No.C-236/Lok/2009 titled “Ramesh Thakur v. Sat

Prakash Rana”. He also seeks the quashing of two separate orders

dated 17th February 2010 passed by the Lokayukta in the said case.

2. Although the Lokayukta, Delhi was impleaded as Respondent No.1 in

this w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top