HIGH COURT OF DELHI
STUDENTS ISLAMIC MOVEMENT OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, HOME & ORS. – Respondent
WP(C)-6030_2007
W.P. (Civil) No. 6030 of 2007 page 1 of 15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) No. 6030 of 2007
STUDENTS ISLAMIC MOVEMENT OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Trideep Pais with
Ms. Bijoylaakshmi Das and
Mr. Mobin Akhtar, Advocates.
versus
THE SECRETARY HOME & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. A.S.Chandhiok, ASG with
Mr. Sachin Datta and
Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Advocates for R-1 & R-2.
Mr. Saleeem Ahmed, Advocate
for R-3 & R-4.
CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be
allowed to see the order?
No
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
Yes
3. Whether the order should be reported
Yes
in Digest?
O R D E R
12.03.2010
1. The Petitioner, Students Islamic Movement of India („SIMI‟), is by
this petition filed through its erstwhile President Mr. Shahi Badr
Falahi, seeking a direction to the Delhi Police to de-seal its premises at
H.No. 151 C Gali No.9, Zakir Nagar, Okhla, New Delhi.
2. The petitioner was by a Notification dated 27th September 2001
issued by the central government under Section 3(1) of the Unlawful
Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 („UAPA‟) declared to be an unlawful
association. This declaration was confirmed by the Unlawful
Activities Prevention Tribunal („Tribunal‟) by an order dated 26th
March 2002 which was published in the gazette dated 8th April 2002.
2010:DHC:1469
W.P. (Civil) No. 6030 of 2007 page 2 of 15
The declaration was for a period of two years i.e. up to 26th September
2003. By a subsequent Notification dated 26th September 2003 under
Section 3 UAPA the petitioner was declared to be an unlawful
association. This was confirmed by a Tribunal by an order on 23rd
March 2004. Thereafter, on 8th February 2006 a fresh Notification was
issued by the Central Government under Section 3(1) UAPA declaring
the Petitioner to be an unlawful association. That Notification was
confirmed by yet another Tribunal by an order dated 7th August 2006.
The current status is that the petitioner continues to be declared by the
central government to be an unlawful association.
3. In terms of Section19 UAPA (prior to the amendment in 2002), the
central government could delegate its powers to the State Government
which in turn could authorise any person working under it to exercise
the powers under the UAPA. (After the amendment in 2002 the
corresponding provision is Section 42 UAPA) By a Notification dated
10th December 1992, the Central Government delegated the powers
under the UAPA to the State Governments and the Administrations of
the Union Territories. Consequent to the above Notification on the
same date i.e. 10th December 1992, the Government of National
Capital Territory of Delhi („GNCTD‟) passed an order authorising the
Commissioner of Police, Delhi to exercise powers under Sections 7
and 8 UAPA.
4. Simultaneous with the issuance on 27th September 2001 of the
2010:DHC:1469
W.P. (Civil) No. 6030 of 2007 page 3 of 15
notification declaring the petitioner to be an unlawful association, the
central government passed the following order:
“ORDER
Subject: Declaration of the Students Islamic Movement of
India as an “unlawful association” under Section 3(1) of
the
Unlawful
Activities
(Prevention)
Act,
1967-
Notification issued by the Central Government under
Section 19, directing that all powers which may be
exercised by the Central Government under sections 7 and
8, shall be exercised also by any State Government/Union
Territory Administration.
Whe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.