OMP 12/2010

Page 1

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

OMP No. 12/2010

13^th January, 2010

M/S. SMJ-RK-SD(JV)

...Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Kiran Suri, Advocate

VERSUS

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA

....Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see

the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

%

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J

I.A. No.295/2010(Exemption) in O.M.P. No.12/2010

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

I.A. is disposed of.

I.A. No.296/2010(Condonation of Delay) in O.M.P. No.12/2010

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the

petition is condoned.

I.A. is disposed of.

2010:DHC:147

OMP 12/2010

Page 2

OMP No. 12/2010

1.

By this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and

Conciliation Act, 1996 the petitioner challenges the impugned Award dated

5.9.09 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal. The Arbitral Tribunal was constituted to

determine the disputes which arose between the petitioner as contractor and the

res