SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
KANNU THRU LRS – Appellant
Versus
DAULAT RAM THRU LRS – Respondent


CM(M) 144/2008

Kannu Through Lrs v. Daulat Ram Through Lrs

Page 1 Of 7

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Reserve: January 19, 2010

Date of Order: March 22, 2010

+ CM(M) 144/2008

%

22.03.2010

Kannu Through Lrs

...Petitioners

Through: Mr. S.S. Panwar with Mr. Sunil Dutt, Advocates

Versus

Daulat Ram Through Lrs

...Respondents

Through: Mr. S.K. Bagga, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Seeraj Bagga,

Advocates

JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes.

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

Yes.

JUDGMENT

1. By way of present petition, the petitioner has assailed an order dated

10th January 2008 passed by the learned ADJ allowing an appeal against an

order dated 29th August 2006 of learned Civil Judge.

2. Brief facts relevant for the purpose of deciding this petition are that the

respondent’s predecessor Daulat Ram, who was allottee of Plot No. 138, had

filed a suit for possession against the predecessor of the respondent. A

decree of possession was passed in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top