HIGH COURT OF DELHI
KLAS TAPE COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
VINOD HARDWARE STORE & OTHERS – Respondent
CS(OS)-900_2007
IA Nos. 5840/2007 & 1827/2007 in CS (OS) No.900/2007
Page 1
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Pronounced on: 04.05.2010
+
I.A. Nos. 5840/2007& 1827/2007
in CS(OS) No. 900/2007
KLAS TAPE COMPANY
..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. H.P. Singh, Advocate.
versus
VINOD HARDWARE STORE & OTHERS ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Manav Kumar with
Mr. Sushant Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
1.
Whether the Reporters of local papers
Yes.
may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
Yes.
3. Whether the judgment should be
Yes.
reported in the Digest?
MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
*
1. This order will dispose of an application for ad-interim injunction moved by the plaintiff
(IA 5840/2007) and the other related application (IA 1827/2007), both filed by the plaintiff, for
interim stay.
2. The plaintiff, by this suit, seeks a decree for permanent injunction to restrain the
defendants, their licencees as the case may be, their servants and agents, distributors, stockists
and the like (or anyone acting on their behalf) from manufacturing, marketing, selling, offering
for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly or dealing with, or passing off in any manner, the
measuring tapes having shape, configuration, label identical to or resembling the plaintiff‟s
2010:DHC:2505
IA Nos. 5840/2007 & 1827/2007 in CS (OS) No.900/2007
Page 2
registered trade mark BILLI and/or CAT, and from infringement of Copyright as well as Design
thereof.
3. The plaintiff is a partnership firm, established in the year 1986 under the trading
name/style “BLOOMING BUDS”, carrying on its business at, 41, Sarang Street, Mumbai-400
003, entered into the business of manufacturing and marketing measuring tapes of wide variety
under the trademark/trade-name „CAT, KLAS BILLIand/or DEVICE OF A CAT/BILLI‟. The
said partnership firm changed its name from “BLOOMING BUDS” to “KLAS TAPE CO.” with
effect from 1st of April, 1995 with the same partners continuing.
4. The plaintiff in respect, of each of its trademark, viz. BILLI, DEVICE OF A CAT, KLAS
BILLI, and CAT claims to be the creator and originator of the artistically designed labels and
outer packing boxes/cartons, which bear an original work of art. Furthermore, says the plaintiff,
the word BILLI, CAT and/or DEVICE OF A CAT/ BILLI forms a prominent feature of the
trading style/trade name and these words are identified with the plaintiff alone. It is submitted
that the plaintiff‟s said labels/cartons in respect of the product, consists of original artistic work
and is registered under the Copyright Act, 1957 under No. A-57712/99. The usage of the mark in
respect of the measuring tape as also the registered proprietor of the mark KLAS MASTER in
Class 09 under the number 547192-B is with effect from 15th March 1991.
5. The plaintiff contends that its product viz. measuring tape is unique and distinctive and
has a new and original shape, configuration, ornamentation and design as regards its outer shape.
The proprietor has also registered the proprietary design in relation to measuring tapes, in India,
under the provisions of the Designs Act, 2000; the design was registered as No. 188336 in
Class10.7. It is argued by the plaintiff that the said marks are etched in the minds of the
purchasing public, who are mainly, an illiterate class of workers and labourers who recognize
demand for the product as „BILLI‟ product, without identifying/ associating anything else, and in
the trade, to be exclusively associated with that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff states that after
registration of the said design and subsequent launch has witnessed a phenomenal and ever
increasing sale of the said product.
6. The plaintiff claims to have spent lakhs of Rupees towards publicity and advertising, in
various media, owing to which the tradema