*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

Crl.M.C. No. 872/2010

Judgment reserved on :

25^th May, 2010

%

Judgment delivered on :

02^nd July, 2010

#

M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED

..............PETITIONER

!

Through:

Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate.

VERSUS

$

SAMBATH KUMAR A

..........RESPONDENT

^

Through:

NEMO.

;

+

Crl.M.C. No. 1148/2010

#

M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED

..............PETITIONER

!

Through:

Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate.

VERSUS

$

ASHWIN R.

..........RESPONDENT

^

Through:

NEMO.

AND

+

Crl.M.C. No. 1235/2010

#

M/S RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED

..............PETITIONER

!

Through:

Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate.

VERSUS

$

NAMITHA DAMANI

..........RESPONDENT

^

Through:

NEMO.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL

1.

Whether reporters of Local paper may be allowed to see the

judgment? YES

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not? YES

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YES

Crl.M.C. Nos. 872, 1148 & 1235/2010

Page 1 of 12

2010:DHC:3205

S.N.AGGARWAL, J

All these three petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 filed by M/s Religare Finvest Limited (hereinafter to be

referred as 'the petit