SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PREMWATI W/O KHICHCHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER – Respondent


CRL.A. No. 486/2002

Page 1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 486 OF 2002

Reserved on : 20th April, 2010.

%

Date of Decision 6th July, 2010.

PREMWATI W/O KHICHCHU .... Appellant.

Through Mr.Anup Bhambani, Ms.Nisha Bhambani,

advocates.

VERSUS

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANOTHER …..Respondents.

Through Ms. Fizani Hussain, advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

YES

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest ?

YES

SANJIV KHANNA, J.:

1. The appellant-Premwati by the impugned judgment dated 12th

December, 2001 has been convicted under Section 109 read with Section

376 and Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred

to as IPC, for short) and by the order dated 13th December, 2001 has been

sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 7 years for the offence under

Section 109 read with Section 376 IPC with a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in

default to suffer simple imprisonment of 3 months. The appella

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top