SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAVINDER KUMAR MAKKAR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M.C.D. & ANR. – Respondent


W.P.(C) No.130/2008 & CM No.227/2008 (for interim relief)

Page 1 of 11

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 9th August, 2010.

+

W.P.(C) No.130/2008 & CM No.227/2008 (for interim relief)

%

RAVINDER KUMAR MAKKAR & ANR.

..... Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Rajan Sabharwal & Ms. Seema

Bhadauriya, Advocates.

Versus

M.C.D. & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate along

with Mr. B.S. Meena, A.E.(MCD).

Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. M.G. Vacher, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM :-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes

in the Digest?

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The present writ petition entails adjudication of, whether the Delhi

Building Bye-Laws, 1983 as modified from time to time, allow/permit

construction of an open staircase in the front setback of a residential house.

2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 5th December, 2005

of the Asstt. Engineer of the MCD, the orde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top