DELHI HIGH COURT
RAVINDER KUMAR MAKKAR & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M.C.D. & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(C) No.130/2008 & CM No.227/2008 (for interim relief)
Page 1 of 11
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 9th August, 2010.
+
W.P.(C) No.130/2008 & CM No.227/2008 (for interim relief)
%
RAVINDER KUMAR MAKKAR & ANR.
..... Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Rajan Sabharwal & Ms. Seema
Bhadauriya, Advocates.
Versus
M.C.D. & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate along
with Mr. B.S. Meena, A.E.(MCD).
Mr. Ravi Gupta, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. M.G. Vacher, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM :-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
1.
Whether reporters of Local papers may
be allowed to see the judgment?
Yes
2.
To be referred to the reporter or not?
Yes
3.
Whether the judgment should be reported
Yes
in the Digest?
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
1. The present writ petition entails adjudication of, whether the Delhi
Building Bye-Laws, 1983 as modified from time to time, allow/permit
construction of an open staircase in the front setback of a residential house.
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 5th December, 2005
of the Asstt. Engineer of the MCD, the orde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.