SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
TOTA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE (G.N.C.T.) OF DELHI – Respondent


W.P.(Crl.) 1824/2009

Page 1 of 5

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(CRL) 1824/2009

Date of Order: January 25, 2010.

TOTA RAM

..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Deepak Sharma, Adv.

versus

STATE (G.N.C.T.) OF DELHI ..... Respondent

Through Mr. Pawan Sharma with Mr. Praveen

Nagar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers

may be allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be

reported in the Digest?

: V.K. JAIN, J. (Oral)

1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

challenging the order passed on 1.10.2009 by the respondent whereby

request of the petitioner for grant of parole was rejected.

2. The petitioner was convicted under Section 302 and 307 IPC

read with Section 34 IPC thereof. The appeal filed by him, being Crl.

Appl. NO.883/2008, was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court

on 16.1.2009. The petitioner applied for parole on the ground that he

2010:DHC:422

W.P.(Crl.) 1824/2009

Page 2 of 5

want to file special leave petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top