Crl.MC No.4044/2009

Sharad Kumar Pandey v Mamta Pandey

Page 1 Of 8

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Reserve: August 10^th, 2010

Date of Order: September 01, 2010

+ Crl.M.C.No.4044 of 2009

%

01.09.2010

Sharad Kumar Pandey

...Petitioner

Versus

Mamta Pandey

...Respondent

Counsels:

Mr. S. Biswajit Meitei for petitioner.

Ms. Liyi Marli Noshi for respondent.

JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes.

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

Yes.

JUDGMENT

1. This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C and under Article 227 of the Constitution

of India has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing/ setting aside the order and

judgment dated 3^rd November 2009 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi

dismissing the revision petition of the petitioner against an order passed by learned

Magistrate taking cognizance of a complaint under Section 12 of The Protection of

Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (in short, “the Act”).

2. The contention raised by the learn