SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Dr.Ajit Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Council of Scientific & Industrial Research – Respondent


Page 1 of 4

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P. (C.) No.3673/2001

%

Date of Decision: 25.01.2010

Dr.Ajit Srivastava

…. Petitioner

Through Nemo.

Council of Scientific & Industrial Research

…. Respondent

Through

Mr.Ravi Sikri and Mr. Vaibhav Kalra,

Advocates.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG

1.

YES

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

NO

3.

NO

ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

Learned counsel for the respondent contends that SLP No.

13948/2003 titled Council of Scientific and Industrial Research and

others Vs. Ramesh Chandra Aggarwal and another, has since been

decided and is also reported as (2009) 3 SCC 35.

In the said appeal before the Supreme Court, the apex court was

concerned with the scheme framed by the Council of Scientific and

Industrial Research and others pursuant to the directions of the Central

Administrative Tribunal and the Supreme Court contemplating

absorption of only those researcher who had put in 15 years of such

2010:DHC:434-DB

Page 2 of 4

continuous research as Fellow/Associate/Project Associate as on 2nd

May, 1997.

The cut-off dated 2nd May, 1997 was challenged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top