SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AKSHAY CHAUDHARY & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent


W.P.(C) No.1897/2010

Page 1 of 15

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 8th September, 2010.

+

W.P.(C) No.1897/2010 & CM No.9422/2010

%

AKSHAY CHAUDHARY & ANR.

..... Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Satyendra Kumar & Ms. Sunita

Bhardwaj, Advocates

Versus

UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate

for R-1.

CORAM :-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes

in the Digest?

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The two petitioners by this writ petition impugn the order of the

respondent no.1 University of Delhi expelling the petitioners from the

respondent no.2 Kirori Mal College of which they were final year students in

the academic session 2009-2010. The complaint against the two petitioners,

who had then been recently promoted to the final year, was of ragging a

fresher admitted in the first year in academic session 2009-2010. The

petitioners were proceeded against in terms of the t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top