SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CITIZEN ROADLINES PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
M.C.D & ANR – Respondent


W.P.(C) No.3552/2008

Page 1 of 4

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 30th September, 2010.

+

W.P.(C) No.3552/2008

%

CITIZEN ROADLINES PVT LTD

.....

PETITIONER

Through:

Mr. H.G.R. Khattar, Advocate

Versus

M.C.D & ANR

.....

RESPONDENTS

Through:

Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate

Ms. Meghna Sankhla, Advocate for

Mr. Vinod Kumar Nagpal, permanent

Managing

Director

of

petitioner

company.

CORAM :-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

No.

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

No.

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest?

No.

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. The petition, filed in May 2008, impugns the order dated 9th April,

1992 of the respondent MCD cancelling the allotment of plot in favour of

the petitioner at Sanjay Gandhi Transport Nagar. Mandamus is also claimed

against the respondent MCD to handover the vacant, peaceful, physical

possession of plot No.BG-141 earlier allotted to the petitioner.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that it was allotted the aforesaid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top