CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 277/2002

Page 1

9. *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 277/2002

Date of decision: 5^th October, 2010

ANNAMUL ..... Appellant

Through Ms. Radhika Chandrasekhar,

Advocate (Amicus Curiae).

versus

STATE ..... Respondent

Through Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, APP for

the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

O R D E R (ORAL)

1.

The appellant has not been served. As per report received from

the trial court, the appellant was released from jail after expiry of his

sentence and on payment of requisite fine imposed. In these

circumstances, I hereby appoint Ms. Radhika Chandrasekhar, Advocate ,

who is present in the Court as Amicus Curiae.

2. By the impugned judgment dated 9^th October, 2001 the appellant

has been convicted under Section 328/379/411 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC, for short). By the impugned order

on sentence dated 27^th October, 2001 the appellant was sentenced to

rigourous imprisonment of four years along with fine of Rs.