HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MOHD. SHEIKH NOOR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
WP(CRL)-1371_2010
19. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(CRL) 1371/2010
MOHD. SHEIKH NOOR HUSSAIN ..... Petitioner
Through Ms. Charu Verma, Advocate.
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Cousnel for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
O R D E R
% 08.10.2010
1.
Learned Standing Counsel prays for and is granted permission to
place on record status report.
2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition
is being heard and is being disposed of by the present order.
3. By the impugned order dated 8th July, 2010, the competent
authority has rejected the request made by the petitioner for grant of
parole on the ground that the petitioner has been convicted for murder
and rape of a minor and the grounds of parole are not genuine.
4. The petitioner has been convicted in FIR No. 252/2002 and has
been in jail for about nine years. He was granted parole for fifteen days
in 2008 and for one month in September-October, 2009. One year has
lapsed since the date on which the petitioner was last released on parole.
2010:DHC:5083
Earlier the petitioner had surrendered six days late after the parole period
expired in October, 2009. There is no allegation that the petitioner had
indulged in any wrongful or illegal activity while on parole.
5. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the petitioner is directed to be
released on parole for a period of four weeks, subject to following
conditions:-
(1)The petitioner will furnish personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with
one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
(2)The petitioner will give residential address where he will be residing
during the period of parole. He shall immediately after reaching the said
destination inform the SHO of the police station concerned about his
arrival. He shall every third day mark his attendance in the said police
station.
(3)He shall give mobile telephone number on which he can be contacted
while on parole. The mobile telephone number need not belong to the
petitioner and can be of any third person, who is ready and willing to
permit the petitioner to be contacted on the said number.
(4)Before the petitioner is released, the SHO of the police station
concerned, i.e., Police Station Sarojini Nagar will contact the person
concerned on the telephone number and verify whether he knows the
petitioner and will permit the petitioner to be contacted on the said
number. It will be open to the SHO, Police Station Sarojini Nagar or any
other officer to contact the petitioner every day on the said telephone
number.
(5)The petitioner must surrender on or before the period of parole is over
and in case he does not surrender by the specified date, appropriate
orders will be passed. This factor will be taken into consideration if and
when the petitioner applies for fresh parole.
2010:DHC:5083
(6)The petitioner will not indulge in any wrongful or illegal activity. In
case any wrongful or illegal activity comes to the notice of the State,
they will be at liberty to apply for cancellation of the parole.
The writ petition is disposed of.
DASTI.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
OCTOBER 08, 2010
VKR/P
2010:DHC:5083
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.