SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRAKASH & ORS – Appellant
Versus
ARUN KUMAR SAINI & ANR – Respondent


MAC.APP.No.602/2009 Page 1 of 40

25 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

MAC.APP.No.602/2009

Date of Decision: 5th February, 2010

%

PRAKASH & ORS

..... Appellants

Through : Mr. F.K. Jha,

Mr. Rupesh Rayan and

Mr. R.N. Singh, Advs.

versus

ARUN KUMAR SAINI & ANR ..... Respondents

Through : Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv.

for R-2.

Ms. Rajdipa Behura, amicus

curiae.

CORAM :-

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.

Whether Reporters of Local papers may

YES

be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

YES

3. Whether the judgment should be

YES

reported in the Digest?

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This appeal involves a important question as to whether

an unborn child in womb should be considered at par with a

minor child.

2. The appellants have challenged the award of the

learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.6,11,000/- has

been awarded to the appellants. The appellants seek

enhancement of the award amount.

3. The accident dated 8th June, 2008 resulted in the death of

Indu Devi. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top