OMP330/2002

Page 1

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

OMP No.330/2002

5th February, 2010

MMTC LIMITED & ANR.

...Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Rohit Puri and Ms. Zurrat Zamal

Kaur, Advocates.

VERSUS

OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.

....Respondent.

Through: Mr. Subhash Oberoi, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see

the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

%

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J

1. By these objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996, the petitioners challenge the Award dated 28.5.2002 of the sole

Arbitrator. The Award decides the dispute of the entitlement of damages of the

respondent on account of the petitioners having failed to supply the contracted

goods viz Sodium Carboxy Methyl Cellulose CMC(LVG) within the agreed

delivery schedule. The facts of the case are that two supply orders were placed

by the respondent on the petitioner No.2 M/s Kalpana Chemicals Limited.

2010:DHC:698

OMP330/2002

Page 2

Petitioner No.2 M/s