SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AGYA RAM SOOD – Appellant
Versus
SAMEER WASON & ANR. – Respondent


C.M. (M) No.185/2010

Page No.1 of 3

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

C.M. (Main) No.185 of 2010 & C.M. Appl. Nos.2427-2428 of 2010

%

11.02.2010

AGYA RAM SOOD

...Petitioner

Through: Mr. P.P. Ahuja, Advocate.

Versus

SAMEER WASON & ANR.

...Respondents

Date of Reserve: 8th February, 2010

Date of Order: 11th February, 2010

JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the reporter or not?

3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?

J U D G M E N T

1.

By this petition, the petitioner has assailed an order dated 31st October, 2009

passed by the learned first appellate court (Rent Control Tribunal) dismissing an

application under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeking permission

to examine additional evidence at the stage of appeal and amendment of the written

statement.

2.

The petitioner in this application prayed for examination of Mr. Ashwani Kumar

Dandona, Advocate to prove that along with the notice dated 17th August, 1998 served on

behalf of the petitioner to respondent No.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top