SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
VANDANA KANDARI & ANOTHER – Respondent


LPA NO. 662/2010 Page 1 of 9

11. *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

LPA 662/2010

UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Appellants

Through Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Advocate.

versus

VANDANA KANDARI & ANR. ..... Respondents

Through Mr. R.K. Saini, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

O R D E R

% 10.01.2011

CM NO. 16542/2010

It is an application for condonation of delay. Having heard Mr.

M.J.S. Rupal, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. R.K. Saini,

learned counsel for the respondent, we are inclined to think that

sufficient ground exist for condonation of delay and accordingly the

same stands condoned.

The application is disposed of.

LPA No. 662/2010

In this intra-Court appeal, the assail is to the order dated 12th July,

2010 whereby the learned single Judge has extended the benefit of

realization of attendance on the ground that the said respondents were on

maternity leave. Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top