RFA No.540/2000

Page 1 of 10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No.540/2000

%

1^st March, 2011

SHRI DHARAM PAL

...... Appellant

Through:

Ms. Ritu Singh Mann, Advocate with Mr.

Dheeraj Kumar Garg, Advocate.

VERSUS

SHRI SHASHI KANT SAINI

...... Respondent

Through:

Mr. P.R. Bahl, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.

The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal under

Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned

judgment and decree dated 18.7.2000 whereby the suit of the

respondent/plaintiff for specific performance has been decreed.

2.

The case of the respondent/plaintiff was that an Agreement to

Sell dated 16.3.1988 was entered into between him as the proposed buyer

and the appellant/defendant as the proposed seller with respect to 9 Bighas

and 4 Biswas of the land comprised in Khasra No.62/27 (3 Biswas), Khasra

2011:DHC:1284

RFA No.540/2000

Page 2 of