WP(C) No.6961/2010 Page 1 of 18

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

WP(C) No.6961/2010

%

Date of Decision: 11.01.2011

India Trade Promotion Organisation & Anr.

…. Petitioners

Through Mr. Piyush Sharma, Advocate

Versus

P.K. Jindal & Anr.

…. Respondents

Through Mr. S. Janani, Advocate for respondent

No. 1

Mr. B.V. Niren, CGSC & Mr. Abhishek

Goyal, Advocate for respondent No. 2

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

YES

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

NO

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in

the Digest?

NO

ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 2^nd February, 2010

passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench in TA

No. 511/2009 titled as P.K. Jindal Vs. Union of India & Ors. quashing

the order dated 8/9^th June, 2000 passed by the Disciplinary Authority

imposing penalty of withholding three increments of pay with

2011:DHC:149-DB

WP(C) No.6961/2010