SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Union of India & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
D.S.Manchanda – Respondent


W.P.(C.) No.215 /2009

Page 1 of 17

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P. (C.) No.215/2009

%

Date of Decision: 10.03.2011

Union of India & Anr.

…. Petitioners

Through Mr.M.M.Sudan, Advocate.

Versus

D.S.Manchanda

…. Respondent

Through

Ms.Meenu Mainee, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

YES

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

NO

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in

the Digest?

NO

ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

1. The petitioners, the Secretary, Ministry of Information and

Broadcasting & Anr., have challenged the order dated 10th July, 2008

passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New

Delhi in OA No.1431 of 2006, titled as „D. S. Manchanda v. Union of

India & Ors.‟, allowing the respondent‟s application and setting aside

the order dated 30th May, 2002 passed by the petitioners in pursuance

of a major penalty proceedings under Rule 14 of the CCS(CCA) Rules,

1965 imposing a penalty in consultation with the UPSC of withholding

2011:DHC:1493-DB

W.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top