SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Uniion of India through Secretary, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Tarlok Singh – Respondent


W.P.(C) 1760/2008

Page 1 of 22

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P.(C) No.1760/2008

%

Date of Decision: 10.03.2011

Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of

Information and Broadcasting & Anr.

…. Petitioners

Through Mr.M.M.Sudan, Advocate

Versus

Tarlok Singh

…. Respondent

Through Ms. Meenu Maini, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

HON’BLE MS.JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

No

3.

Whether the judgment should be

reported in the Digest?

No

ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

1. The petitioners Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of

Information and Broadcasting and Anr. have challenged the order dated

12th March, 2007 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal,

Principal Bench in O.A No.2759/2005 titled as „Sh.Tarlok Singh v.

Union of India and Ors allowing the original application of the

respondent and setting aside the order dated 28th August, 2002 of

major punishment imposed upon the respondent and holding that

2011:DHC:1495-DB

W.P.(C) 1760/2008

Page 2 of 22

consequent to setting aside of major punishment the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top