SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
State Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Vijay Lakshmi Thakral – Respondent


RFA No.141/2003 Page 1 of 28

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment reserved on: 18.11.2010

Judgment delivered on: 15.03.2011

RFA No.141/2003

STATE BANK OF INDIA

……Appellant

Through: Mr.S.L. Gupta & Mr. Ram Gupta,

Advocates.

Vs.

SMT.VIJAY LAKSHMI THAKRAL

……Respondent

Through: Mr. J.R.Bajaj, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes

in the Digest?

KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.

*

1.

By this appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of

Civil procedure, 1908 the appellant seeks to set aside the

judgment and decree dated 11.11.2002 passed by the Court of

2011:DHC:1550

RFA No.141/2003 Page 2 of 28

the ADJ, Delhi whereby the suit for recovery filed by the

respondent was decreed in favour of the respondent and

against the appellant.

2.

Brief facts of the case relevant for deciding the

present appea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top