SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
B.DEY, DIRECTOR M/S. SUNDSTRAND FORM PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S JAYSON INTERNATIONAL – Respondent


Crl.M.C. No. 309/2010

Page 1 of 5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment delivered on: March 21, 2011

+

CRL.M.C. NO. 309/2010

B.DEY, DIRECTOR

M/S. SUNDSTRAND FORMS PVT. LTD. & ANR.

....PETITIONERS

Through: Mr. O.P.Khadaria, Advocate.

Versus

M/S. JAYSON INTERNATIONAL

.....RESPONDENT

Through: Mr.M.K.Verma, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE

1. Whether Reporters of local papers

may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be

reported in Digest ?

AJIT BHARIHOKE, J.(ORAL)

1. This is a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of

the impugned order dated 12th October, 2009 passed by the learned

M.M., Delhi, condoning the delay in filing of the complaint under

Section 138 N.I.Act and the consequent order dated 09th November,

2009 issuing process against the petitioner for appearance and

undergoing trial under Section 138 N.I.Act.

2. Briefly stated, facts relevant for this petition are that the

respondent M/s. Jayson International, a partnership firm filed a

2011:DHC:1668

Crl.M.C. No. 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top