DELHI HIGH COURT
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR – Respondent
RSA No.34/2006
Page 1 of 10
R-199
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment reserved on: 17.03.2011
Judgment delivered on: 22.03.2011
+
RSA No.34/2006
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
………..Appellants
Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate.
Versus
SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR
……….Respondent
Through: Dr. Nepal Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to
see the judgment?
2.To be referred to the Reporter or not?
Yes
3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Yes
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
1
This appeal has impugned the judgment and decree dated
06.08.2005 which had reversed the findings of the trial Judge dated
20.07.1998. Vide judgment and decree dated 20.07.1998, the suit
filed by the plaintiff Sushil Kumar seeking a declaration and
mandatory injunction to the effect that his termination of service
vide order dated 31.10.1988 be declared null and void had been
dismissed. The impugned judgment had reversed this finding. The
suit of the plaintiff stood decreed.
2
The plaintiff had joined the service of the Ce
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.