SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR – Respondent


RSA No.34/2006

Page 1 of 10

R-199

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment reserved on: 17.03.2011

Judgment delivered on: 22.03.2011

+

RSA No.34/2006

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

………..Appellants

Through: Ms. Anjana Gosain, Advocate.

Versus

SHRI SUSHIL KUMAR

……….Respondent

Through: Dr. Nepal Singh, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to

see the judgment?

2.To be referred to the Reporter or not?

Yes

3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Yes

INDERMEET KAUR, J.

1

This appeal has impugned the judgment and decree dated

06.08.2005 which had reversed the findings of the trial Judge dated

20.07.1998. Vide judgment and decree dated 20.07.1998, the suit

filed by the plaintiff Sushil Kumar seeking a declaration and

mandatory injunction to the effect that his termination of service

vide order dated 31.10.1988 be declared null and void had been

dismissed. The impugned judgment had reversed this finding. The

suit of the plaintiff stood decreed.

2

The plaintiff had joined the service of the Ce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top