DELHI HIGH COURT
DENA BANK – Appellant
Versus
MS.KAMLESH RANI – Respondent
RFA No.370-2009
Page 1 of 15
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
RFA No.370/2009
%
Judgment Delivered on: 31.03.2011
DENA BANK
..... Appellant
Through :
Mr.Pallav Saxena and Mr.Harshit
Tripathi, Advocates
versus
MS.KAMLESH RANI
..... Respondent
Through :
Mr.Jagdish Chandra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
1.
Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed
to see the Judgment ?
Yes
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?
Yes
3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the
Digest?
Yes
G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL)
1.
Present appeal has been filed against the judgment and
preliminary decree in a suit for possession and recovery dated
14.09.2009 passed by the trial court on an application filed by
the respondent herein under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of
Civil Procedure.
2.
The brief facts necessary to be noticed for disposal of the
present appeal are that the respondent had filed a suit for
possession, recovery of amount of `10,41,360/- as arrears of
rent excluding all other charges, mesne profit along with the
pendente lite interest @18% per annum against the appellant.
The respondent is the absolut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.