WP(C) No.761/2005

Page 1 of 15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

WP(C) No.761/2005

%

Date of Decision: 01.04.2011

Prahlad Singh

…. Petitioner

Through Mr. A.K.Behera, Advocate

Versus

UOI & Ors.

…. Respondents

Through Ms. Gayatri Verma, Advocate for UOI

Ms. Deepa Rai, Advocate for

respondent No.2

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers

may be allowed to see the judgment?

YES

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

NO

3.

Whether the judgment should be

reported in the Digest?

NO

ANIL KUMAR, J.

*

1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 22^nd April, 2004,

passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New

Delhi in OA 2233/2003 titled as Prahlad Singh vs. UOI & Ors.

dismissing the original application filed by the petitioner against the

order dated 23^rd April, 2002 passed against him imposing the

penalty of compulsory retirement with reduction of pensionary

2011:DHC:1996-DB

WP(C) No.761/2005

Page 2 of 15

benefits to 1/3^rd of the family pension as well as modified appellate

order dated 16^th November, 2003 whereby along with c