CONT.CAS(C) 173/2011Page 1 of 11

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 1^st April, 2011

+

CONT.CAS(C)173/2011

VIMAL KUMAR

..... Petitioner/Relator

Through:

Mr. R.K. Saini with Mr. Sitab Ali

Choudhary and Ms. Aradhna Mittal,

Advocates

Versus

RAMESH NEGI & ANR.

..... Respondents/Alleged Contemnor

Through:

None.

CORAM :-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

1.

Whether reporters of Local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

Yes

2.

To be referred to the reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes

in the Digest?

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1.

Contempt is averred of the order dated 11^th November, 2009 of this

Court on an application of the petitioner / relator under Section 17B of the

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 directing the alleged contemnor to pay to

the petitioner / relator from the date of the award and till the decision of

2011:DHC:2002

CONT.CAS(C) 173/2011Page 2 of 11

the writ petition, last drawn wages or minimum wages whichever is higher

and on the other terms and conditions stipulated in the order. It is the case

of