SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ MANU & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS – Respondent


W.P. (C) No. 3297/2011 Page 1 of 6

41. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 3297/2011

Date of order: 16th May, 2011

MANOJ MANU & ANR. ..... Petitioners

Through Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Padma Kumar S., Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondent

Through Mr. Jai Shri Raj with Mr. D.S.

Mahendru, Advocates for respondent

Nos. 1, 3 & 4.

Mr. Naresh Kaushik and Ms. Joymoti

Mize, Advocates for UPSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

1.Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ?

SANJIV KHANNA, J.:

By the impugned order dated 29th March, 2011, the

Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (tribunal, for

short) has dismissed the Original Application of the petitioners.

2. The writ petitioners, who were working as Assistant in

Central

Secretariat

Service,

had

appeared

in

Limited

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top