WP(C)No.2910/2011 Page 1 of 7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 31^st May, 2011

+

W.P.(C) 2910/2011

VINEET MEHTA

..... Petitioner

Through: Ms.Ritu Bhardwaj, Advocate

versus

UOI AND ORS.

.....Respondents

Through: Mr.Ravinder Aggarwal, Advocate

with Mr. Lt.Col. Manish Kumar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

1.Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed

to see the judgment?

2.To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.

1.

Petitioner claims that after serving in Kupwara (J & K) he

came on a normal posting to Delhi and that this was the first

posting in Delhi after petitioner put in 14½ years’ service.

2.

As per the petitioner his wife could not conceive due to

some medical problems and for which IVF treatment was

undertaken and that on medical grounds he was retained at

Delhi after 2 years posting at Delhi came to an end.

3.

Though the dates have n