DELHI HIGH COURT
NEPAL SINGH RAWAL – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent
Page 1 of 35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
CRL.APPEAL NO.826/2004
NEPAL SINGH RAWAL
……Appellant
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate
Versus
CBI
……Respondent
Through: Mr.A.K.Gautam, Standing
Counsel for CBI with Mr. Neeraj
Kapoor, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed
to see the judgment? YES
2. To be referred to Reporter or not?
YES
3. Whether the judgment should be reported
in the Digest?
YES
1. The
instant
appeal
is
being
filed
against
the
judgment/order dated 27.10.2004 of Special Judge wherein
the appellant was convicted to rigorous imprisonment for
two years and to pay a fine of `25,000/- for the offence
punishable under Section 7 of the PC Act. In default of
payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for
three months each. Convict is further sentenced to rigorous
imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of `25,000/-
for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with
13(1)(d) of PC Act. In default of payment of fine, he shall
2011:DHC:3253
Page 2 of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.