SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEPAL SINGH RAWAL – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent


Page 1 of 35

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

CRL.APPEAL NO.826/2004

NEPAL SINGH RAWAL

……Appellant

Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate

with Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate

Versus

CBI

……Respondent

Through: Mr.A.K.Gautam, Standing

Counsel for CBI with Mr. Neeraj

Kapoor, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed

to see the judgment? YES

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

YES

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest?

YES

1. The

instant

appeal

is

being

filed

against

the

judgment/order dated 27.10.2004 of Special Judge wherein

the appellant was convicted to rigorous imprisonment for

two years and to pay a fine of `25,000/- for the offence

punishable under Section 7 of the PC Act. In default of

payment of fine, he shall undergo simple imprisonment for

three months each. Convict is further sentenced to rigorous

imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of `25,000/-

for the offence punishable under Section 13(2) read with

13(1)(d) of PC Act. In default of payment of fine, he shall

2011:DHC:3253

Page 2 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top