O.M.P. No. 280/2011

Page 1 of 19

18.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

Date of Decision: 02.08.2011

%

O.M.P. 280/2011

RESOLUTION INDIA LTD

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Arun Verma, Advocate.

versus

ONE CHROME LLC & ORS

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr.

Rajeeve

Mehra,

Senior

Advocate with Mr. Ananya Kumar,

Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may

be allowed to see the judgment?

:

No

2.

To be referred to Reporter or not?

:

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported

in the Digest?

:

Yes

VIPIN SANGHI, J. (Oral)

1.

This petition has been preferred under Section 9 of the

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) to seek certain orders

of restraint against the respondents. On issuance of notice by this

Court (which was issued on account of the petitioner making a

statement that the petitioner is willing to negotiate a deal with the

2011:DHC:3875

O.M.P. No. 280/2011

Page 2 of 19

respondents), the respondents have put in appearance and filed their

short reply. I may note that on 08.07.2011, the respondent had stated

that there was no poss