SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SPICE ENTERTAINMENT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX – Respondent


ITA 475/2011 & ITA 476/2011

Page 1 of 13

REPORTABLE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

ITA 475 OF 2011

&

ITA 476 OF 2011

JUDGMENT RESERVED ON:31.05.2011

JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON:03.8.2011

(1)

ITA 475 OF 2011

SPICE ENTERTAINMENT LTD.

….APPELLANT

Through:

Mr.Ajay

Vohra,

Advocate

with

Ms.Kavita Jha and Mr.Somnath Shukla,

Advocates.

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX

….RESPONDENT

Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Advocate.

(2)

ITA 476 OF 2011

SPICE ENTERTAINMENT LTD.

….APPELLANT

Through:

Mr.Ajay

Vohra,

Advocate

with

Ms.Kavita Jha and Mr.Somnath Shukla,

Advocates.

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX

….RESPONDENT

Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the

Judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest?

2011:DHC:3905-DB

ITA 475/2011 & ITA 476/2011

Page 2 of 13

A.K. SIKRI,J.

1.

The relevant facts giving rise to the filing of these appeals, which touch upon

the questions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top