page 1 of 13

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Judgment Reserved on : 6^th July, 2011

%

Judgment Pronounced on: 9^thAugust, 2011

+

WP(C) No. 12787/2009

Deepak Khosla

..... Petitioner

Through:

Petitioner in person.

Versus

Union of India & Ors.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Adv. for UOI

Mr.Rajiv Bansal, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

1 Whether reporters of the local papers be allowed to see the

judgment?

Yes

2 To be referred to the Reporter or not?

Yes

3 Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Yes

DIPAK MISRA, CJ

The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of

the Constitution of India to declare that the petitioner is entitled to non-

intrusively

audio-record

judicial

proceedings

that

involve

his

participation before this Court and to so record either by himself or

2011:DHC:4013-DB

page 2 of 13

through his advocate on record; to issue a writ of prohibition or a writ

of any other nature or description to command the respondent Nos.3

and 4, the Registrar General and the Registrar of this Court, not to

inter