SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURINDER KUMAR GROVER – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ORS – Respondent


FAO 269/2006 Page 1 of 11

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

FAO 269/2006

SURINDER KUMAR GROVER

..... Appellant

Through

Mr. R.K. Jain, Adv

VERSUS

STATE & ORS

.... Respondents

Through

Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Adv. for R-2 to 7.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed

Yes

to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to Reporter or not?

Yes

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes

:

MOOL CHAND GARG,J

1. The short point involved in this matter is as to whether the Will,

subject matter of the probate alleged to have been executed by late Sh

K.K.Grover, has been proved or not in accordance with law. The execution

of a Will can be proved by following provisions contained under Section 68

of the Evidence Act which reads as under:

Section 68 - Proof of execution of document required by

law to be attested

If a document is required by law to be attested, it shall not be

used as evidence until one attesting witness at least has been

ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top