RFA No.873/2003

Page 1 of 10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

RFA No.873/2003

%

12^th September, 2011

SH.RAVISH CHAND JAIN

...... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Prakash Khandelwal, Adv.

VERSUS

SMT. RAJ RANI JAIN & ORS.

...... Respondents

Through: Mr.Randhir Jain with

Mr. Dhananjai Jain, Advs.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA

1.

Whether the Reporters of local papers may be

allowed to see the judgment?

2.

To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL)

1.

The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal under

Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), is to the impugned

judgment and decree dated 8.9.2003, and by which judgment the Court

below dismissed the suit for partition filed by the appellant/plaintiff. In the

suit the appellant/plaintiff had sought 1/6^th share of the house bearing No.

119, Bahubali Enclave, Delhi.

2.

A reading of the pleadings of the appellant/plaintiff shows that

the appellant/plaintiff pleaded existence of an HUF. The appellant/plaintiff

2011:DHC:4651

RFA No.873/2003

Page 2 of 10

thereafte