Crl. M.C. 973/2011

Page 1 of 10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.M.C. 973/2011

%

Reserved on: 10^th August, 2011

Decided on: 21^st September, 2011

SURESH NANDA

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. C.A. Sundram, Sr. Adv. and Mr.

Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv., with Mr.

R.N. Karanjawala, Mr. R.K. Handoo,

Mr. Sandeep Kapoor, Mr. Shivek

Trehan, Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Advs.

versus

CBI

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for

CBI.

Coram:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may

Not Necessary

be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

Yes

3. Whether the judgment should be reported

Yes

in the Digest?

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

1. The grievance of the Petitioner is the denial of permission to go aboard.

A narration of facts before adverting to the issue in question:

i)

The Petitioner, a citizen of India, settled in United Kingdom, having

NRI status since 1984, ordinarily resided in the United Kingdom upto 2006,

2011:DHC:4868

Crl. M.C. 973/2