SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INDER SINGH & ORS. – Respondent


FAO.Nos.408/2002 & 350/1998 Page 1 of 71

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision : 30th September, 2011

+

FAO.No.408/2002

%

SUNIL KUMAR

…Appellant

Through : Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv.

versus

INDER SINGH & ORS.

…Respondents

Through : Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv.

for R-3.

Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa,

amicus curiae.

+

FAO.No.350/1998

%

BAJRANG LAL

…Appellant

Through : Mr. Dinesh Kapoor, Adv.

versus

SEHDEV & ORS.

…Respondents

Through : Mr. K.L. Nandwani, Adv. for

R-3.

CORAM :-

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA

1.

Whether Reporters of Local papers may

YES

be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

YES

3. Whether the judgment should be

YES

reported in the Digest?

2011:DHC:5092

FAO.Nos.408/2002 & 350/1998 Page 2 of 71

JUDGMENT

J.R. MIDHA, J.

*

FAO No.408/2002

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned

Tribunal whereby compensation of `1,10,642/- has been

awarded to the appellant. The appellant seeks enhancement

of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top